On March 19, 2003, then-President Bush informed the nation that American and coalition forces had entered Iraq.

As people took sides and our boys began coming home with grave injuries (and in body bags), people asked: Can you support our troops but not the war?

Comments

You must Login or Register to post comments or replies.

thedelphinater says:
 

Soldiers have no control over where they are sent and what they do. If you're drafted, it's not your fault your fighting in a war. It's really the rulers' faults for starting the war.

 
wheres_lindsey says:
 

I agree, except the men fighting in Irag weren't drafted. If we help them, say with medical attention when they get home, they'll most likely fight the next chance they get. Whether that's good or bad is subjective.

 
Suzyquzy2013 says:
 

Soldiers don't pick where they go and what they do we should suport them but not the war they didn't start the war so they shouldn't have to pay the price.

 
mai109 says:
 

I know. It's my personal opinion that we never should have even touched this war. That way we could have saved THOUSANDS OF LIVES!!!

 
AniLib says:
 

Soldiers are soldiers, there cannot be a war without people to fight it.
If people are against the war, the single best thing they can do is NOT enlist and keep others from doing the same!!!

 
Mae 13 says:
 

I feel that if the soldiers were drafted, it would be a completely different story! They signed up two kille people, they knew there was a war, they signedup anyway. They signed up to murder. And therefore they don't deserve our support.